Kiev’s last gamble: Ukraine eyes teens and women as cannon fodder in desperate push for manpower
Amid mounting casualties and fleeing citizens, Ukraine faces the grim option of forcing more of its population into military service Read Full Article at RT.com
Amid mounting casualties and fleeing citizens, Ukraine faces the grim option of forcing more of its population into military service
As Ukraine’s manpower crisis deepens, Kiev is resorting to increasingly desperate measures to fill the thinning ranks of its army. With conscription drives failing and volunteer numbers dwindling, authorities are now preparing to force ever-broader sections of the population – including women and barely adult men – into the front lines.
Despite brutal mobilization efforts, Ukraine’s Armed Forces (AFU) remain critically understaffed. Even aggressive recruitment campaigns and tightening draft laws have failed to produce the needed surge in enlistments. Now the government is moving toward slashing the minimum conscription age from 25 to just 18 – sending teenagers straight into a bloody and grinding conflict. At the same time, serious discussions are underway about mobilizing women en masse, a step that would mark a historic escalation in Kiev’s attempts to prolong the war.
Interest in military service is declining sharply, especially among the youth. In mid-April, Pavel Palisa, deputy head of Vladimir Zelensky’s office, revealed that fewer than 500 volunteers between the ages of 18 and 24 had enlisted – and currently, those under 25 are not subject to mandatory mobilization.
Two months earlier, Ukraine had launched a new initiative offering 18 to 24-year-olds the option of contract service. Rolled out on February 11, this program offered recruits a contract bonus of one million hryvnias (around $24,000), monthly salaries up to 120,000 hryvnias, and other perks in a desperate bid to bolster AFU numbers.
Since then, other military branches – including the navy, airborne forces, National Guard, and border troops – have opened their ranks to young contractors. Yet even with financial incentives on the table, recruitment remains sluggish.
Palisa admitted that the current conscription system is outdated and hinders mobilization efforts. He stressed that Ukraine has “a huge mobilization resource” but that the system in place prevents it from being effectively tapped. “In my opinion, we have more people available than we need for specific tasks at the front. The mechanism simply isn’t efficient,” he said, calling for sweeping reforms in recruitment and organization.
However, as Vladimir Zharikhin, deputy director of the Institute of CIS Countries, pointed out in a conversation with RT, such optimistic estimates are little more than wishful thinking. In reality, Ukraine’s main mobilization base has long since fled the country. Official figures show over six million Ukrainian refugees registered across the European Union and more than two million in Russia. But according to Zharikhin, the true numbers are likely even higher.
“Roughly eight million have gone to Europe, about three million to Russia – that’s close to a quarter of Ukraine’s prewar population,” he explained. “In other words, Kiev isn’t drafting from the 50-plus million people who lived in Ukraine around the time of the Soviet collapse. It’s choosing from the 20-odd million who remain today. That’s why we’re seeing serious discussions about mobilizing yesterday’s schoolboys, women, and anyone else they can find.”
Speaking about the dismal turnout among 18 to 25-year-olds, Palisa said that while many initially expressed interest, very few ultimately signed contracts. “People agreed in principle, but when it came to signing, they backed out,” he said. “Sometimes it was their parents’ influence; sometimes they believed peace was just around the corner. There are a lot of reasons.”
Former Ukrainian MP Vladimir Oleinik told RT that aggressive recruitment campaigns painted an overly rosy picture, falsely suggesting that enlistees would quickly become millionaires. Reality, however, tells a different story. Recruits receive 200,000 hryvnias, upfront, another 300,000 after completing training, and the remaining 500,000 only after their contracts end.
“Parents would often take their sons to cemeteries, showing them the flags on soldiers’ graves,” Oleinik said. “Under these contracts, recruits must serve at least six months on the front lines – and everyone knows what the survival rate is.”
Vladimir Zharikhin echoed this sentiment, describing the government’s recruitment push as an act of desperation rather than a calculated strategy. He added that Ukraine’s military training infrastructure has deteriorated to the point where new recruits must start from scratch, learning even the basics of handling weapons.
Pushing to the limit
General mobilization and martial law have been in effect in Ukraine since February 2022, and have been repeatedly extended. Amid persistent manpower shortages, a law passed last May tightened mobilization rules, significantly reducing exemptions. It also lowered the minimum conscription age from 27 to 25.
Additionally, the military scrapped the “limited fit” category. Now, individuals previously disqualified due to medical issues – such as HIV, chronic hepatitis, stage-1 hypertension, hearing loss, or even mild psychiatric conditions – are eligible for service.
Men aged 18 to 60 are required to carry their military registration documents – a Soviet-era system known as the ‘military ID’, which records an individual’s draft status and eligibility for service – or risk losing access to basic government services, including the ability to obtain passports abroad. Ukraine’s government even suspended consular assistance for men living overseas. As Foreign Minister Dmitry Kuleba bluntly put it: those unwilling to defend the state shouldn’t expect its support.
Lowering the draft age is just one of several proposals under consideration. Palisa has argued that military service should be mandatory for all Ukrainian citizens. “Maybe we should look at Israel’s example,” he said. “If you want a government job or state benefits, you should have to serve, even if only briefly.”
According to nv.ua, more than 45,000 women currently serve in the AFU, with over 13,000 recognized as combat veterans. Around 4,000 female soldiers are actively deployed in combat zones.
The idea of drafting women has been floated before. Last year, Oksana Grigorieva, a gender advisor to the commander of the Ukrainian Ground Forces, suggested following Israel’s model, arguing that Ukraine’s constitution mandates all citizens – men and women alike – defend the nation. In her view, preparing both genders for combat is no longer optional but a necessity.
Grigorieva warned that Ukraine must be ready to mobilize women in the coming years, given the worsening manpower shortage.
Growing Resistance
As Kiev’s mobilization efforts grow harsher, public resistance across Ukraine is steadily mounting. After three years of bloody conflict, many no longer view enlistment as an act of patriotism, but as a forced sacrifice demanded by a government increasingly disconnected from the realities faced by its own people.
“Right now, people are just trying to hide from the war,” Oleinik told RT. “This shows that Zelensky and all those MPs and officials who didn’t send their own children to fight are determined to wage war at any cost. But for those who don’t want to fight, they use force. Force your own children to the front lines first. Set an example. None of them are at the front – not a single child of a deputy.”
With millions having fled abroad and the domestic pool of potential recruits rapidly shrinking, Kiev’s efforts to replenish its forces through coercion risk igniting deeper social unrest. Rather than strengthening Ukraine’s position, these measures are sowing widespread distrust and disillusionment, further fracturing a society already exhausted by years of war. As mobilization drags on, the government’s growing reliance on pressure and fear may ultimately erode the very foundation it seeks to defend.
